In Memoriam: Tai'lahr
OpenUru.org, along with the rest of the Mystonline community, is mourning the loss of Tai'lahr on October 16th, 2019.
Rest in Peace, friend.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Starting Point Debate"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Um, what project name would it be? Perhaps "Beginnings - Debate"? I made it as a sort of hub page for all the Beginnings: Projects, so it's basically a summary of all arguments I could find and the potential problems that need to be solved. There should also be a KI hub and an Instancing hub, but I don't feel knowledgeable in those areas to make them. | Um, what project name would it be? Perhaps "Beginnings - Debate"? I made it as a sort of hub page for all the Beginnings: Projects, so it's basically a summary of all arguments I could find and the potential problems that need to be solved. There should also be a KI hub and an Instancing hub, but I don't feel knowledgeable in those areas to make them. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I see what you're doing. I was thinking the word 'debate' should not be included in the title of an article about any one proposal. But this looks like a page doing what it says, summarizing the different proposals. So that's actually a good title. It should include links to the various proposals on the wiki. If there's no wiki article yet, a link to a forum thread will have to do. Now, all you have to do is get the authors of the major proposals to write their articles which, theoretically, include consolidation of the forum discussions. ;) | ||
Revision as of 11:26, 29 January 2009
Please consider giving this more scope and making it something like "Beginnings:<project name>" or "Origin Points:<project name>". Look at Marten's work on instancing as an example.
Um, what project name would it be? Perhaps "Beginnings - Debate"? I made it as a sort of hub page for all the Beginnings: Projects, so it's basically a summary of all arguments I could find and the potential problems that need to be solved. There should also be a KI hub and an Instancing hub, but I don't feel knowledgeable in those areas to make them.
I see what you're doing. I was thinking the word 'debate' should not be included in the title of an article about any one proposal. But this looks like a page doing what it says, summarizing the different proposals. So that's actually a good title. It should include links to the various proposals on the wiki. If there's no wiki article yet, a link to a forum thread will have to do. Now, all you have to do is get the authors of the major proposals to write their articles which, theoretically, include consolidation of the forum discussions. ;)