Talk:Age Projects - David's Journey

Please consider giving this more scope to consider OpenURU.org as a whole and making it something like "Projects:<project name>" or "Expansion Projects:<project name>". Look at Marten's work on instancing as an example. -- Admin

Okay, I'll try. "Move" takes it to another page, right? Perhaps the term "Age Projects:", so that things like KI reforms or such can still have the generic "Projects:" name. As for scope, any suggestions on how to make it more broad? --Gehn, lord of ages 16:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

NDA

The NDA section seems to dominate the page, which possibly detracts from the intent and purpose of the page as a whole. Also, the text seems to be largely copied from the header of the NDA form itself, so it doesn't sit well in the context of the page. Suggest reducing this to a single paragraph outline of the NDA and linking to a new David's Journey NDA page, where you can provide the expanded description of the scope of the NDA, link to your form, and maybe add other details: Things that come to mind are -

• How will people know who has signed your NDA? That need not be public information, but your other signatories need to know.
• Is there a private forum or webspace accessible only to signatories?

Mac Fife 06:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Does this look good? I had contemplated separating the nda before, but didn't know if that would be okay (and hadn't thought of all the other stuff to put with it). Thanks. --Gehn, lord of ages 17:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Cool. I was just worried that having a (relatively) big section on the NDA on the main page might put some folks off. --Mac Fife 18:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Links

I tidied up some off-wiki links today, and noticed that the last link at the bottom of the page (Questions and Answers) simply points to the root of the English Wikipedia - Is this what you really intended? -- Mac Fife 12:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)