Talk:MOSS/Setup - Revision history

Mac Fife: moved Talk:MOSS-Setup to Talk:MOSS/Setup

2012-02-21T12:58:37Z

moved Talk:MOSS-Setup to Talk:MOSS/Setup

Mac Fife at 22:41, 17 February 2012

2012-02-17T22:41:38Z

Lyrositor at 21:05, 17 February 2012

2012-02-17T21:05:22Z

Admin: Added request for mod to be done in a single edit (instead of one at a time). grr.

2012-02-17T17:07:48Z

Added request for mod to be done in a single edit (instead of one at a time). grr.

Admin: Created page with "Recent changes have added future tense to the instructions. e.g., "will bring" instead of "brings". Writing in the future tense adds more words to read and adds abtraction to wh..."

2012-02-17T17:05:51Z

Created page with "Recent changes have added future tense to the instructions. e.g., "will bring" instead of "brings". Writing in the future tense adds more words to read and adds abtraction to wh..."

New page

Recent changes have added future tense to the instructions. e.g., "will bring" instead of "brings". Writing in the future tense adds more words to read and adds abtraction to what are essentially instructions to be followed in real time. I'd really like to see this article and others that have been recently changed in the same style be returned to the present tense. -- [[User:Admin|Admin]] 10:05, 17 February 2012 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:41, 17 February 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:I'll start working on it. Also, how about using code tags instead of tt tags, since they now look the same (and code is not deprecated)? --[[User:Lyrositor\|Lyrositor]] 14:05, 17 February 2012 (MST)		:I'll start working on it. Also, how about using code tags instead of tt tags, since they now look the same (and code is not deprecated)? --[[User:Lyrositor\|Lyrositor]] 14:05, 17 February 2012 (MST)
		+	::Personally, I'd prefer <nowiki><code> to <tt></nowiki> but until I get around to writing a bot task to change '''all''' the instances in the wiki I've let them go, rather than make edits that didn't really add value. I've just changed the attributes of the <nowiki><tt></nowiki> tag so that it has the same appearance as <nowiki><code></nowiki> anyway. If the appearance is correct, I'm not inclined to up the edit count just to tweak a few HTML tags. Use <nowiki><code></nowiki> for new material, but leave any existing <nowiki><tt></nowiki> unless you're revising that paragraph anyway. --[[User:Mac Fife\|Mac Fife]] 15:41, 17 February 2012 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:05, 17 February 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Recent changes have added future tense to the instructions. e.g., "will bring" instead of "brings". Writing in the future tense adds more words to read and adds abtraction to what are essentially instructions to be followed in real time. I'd really like to see this article and others that have been recently changed in the same style be returned to the present tense. In a single edit! -- [[User:Admin\|Admin]] 10:05, 17 February 2012 (MST)		Recent changes have added future tense to the instructions. e.g., "will bring" instead of "brings". Writing in the future tense adds more words to read and adds abtraction to what are essentially instructions to be followed in real time. I'd really like to see this article and others that have been recently changed in the same style be returned to the present tense. In a single edit! -- [[User:Admin\|Admin]] 10:05, 17 February 2012 (MST)
		+
		+	:I'll start working on it. Also, how about using code tags instead of tt tags, since they now look the same (and code is not deprecated)? --[[User:Lyrositor\|Lyrositor]] 14:05, 17 February 2012 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:07, 17 February 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Recent changes have added future tense to the instructions. e.g., "will bring" instead of "brings". Writing in the future tense adds more words to read and adds abtraction to what are essentially instructions to be followed in real time. I'd really like to see this article and others that have been recently changed in the same style be returned to the present tense. -- [[User:Admin\|Admin]] 10:05, 17 February 2012 (MST)	+	Recent changes have added future tense to the instructions. e.g., "will bring" instead of "brings". Writing in the future tense adds more words to read and adds abtraction to what are essentially instructions to be followed in real time. I'd really like to see this article and others that have been recently changed in the same style be returned to the present tense. In a single edit! -- [[User:Admin\|Admin]] 10:05, 17 February 2012 (MST)

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:58, 21 February 2012
(No difference)