Talk:Starting Point Debate - Revision history

Mac Fife: Added poster attributions to make comments easier to follow

2009-02-01T21:55:30Z

Added poster attributions to make comments easier to follow

Admin at 17:26, 29 January 2009

2009-01-29T17:26:09Z

Gehn, lord of ages at 16:44, 29 January 2009

2009-01-29T16:44:51Z

Admin: New page: Please consider giving this more scope and making it something like "Beginnings:" or "Origin Points:". Look at Marten's work on instancing as an example.

2009-01-28T20:45:24Z

New page: Please consider giving this more scope and making it something like "Beginnings:<project name>" or "Origin Points:<project name>". Look at Marten's work on instancing as an example.

New page

Please consider giving this more scope and making it something like "Beginnings:<project name>" or "Origin Points:<project name>". Look at Marten's work on instancing as an example.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Please consider giving this more scope and making it something like "Beginnings:<project name>" or "Origin Points:<project name>".  Look at Marten's work on instancing as an example.
+Please consider giving this more scope and making it something like "Beginnings:<project name>" or "Origin Points:<project name>".  Look at Marten's work on instancing as an example. -- [[User:Admin|Admin]]
-Um, what project name would it be?  Perhaps "Beginnings - Debate"?  I made it as a sort of hub page for all the Beginnings: Projects, so it's basically a summary of all arguments I could find and the potential problems that need to be solved.  There should also be a KI hub and an Instancing hub, but I don't feel knowledgeable in those areas to make them.
+Um, what project name would it be?  Perhaps "Beginnings - Debate"?  I made it as a sort of hub page for all the Beginnings: Projects, so it's basically a summary of all arguments I could find and the potential problems that need to be solved.  There should also be a KI hub and an Instancing hub, but I don't feel knowledgeable in those areas to make them. -- [[User:Gehn, lord of ages|Gehn, lord of ages]]
-I see what you're doing.  I was thinking the word 'debate' should not be included in the title of an article about any one proposal.  But this looks like a page doing what it says, summarizing the different proposals.  So that's actually a good title.  It should include links to the various proposals on the wiki.  If there's no wiki article yet, a link to a forum thread will have to do.  Now, all you have to do is get the authors of the major proposals to write their articles which, theoretically, include consolidation of the forum discussions.  ;)
+I see what you're doing.  I was thinking the word 'debate' should not be included in the title of an article about any one proposal.  But this looks like a page doing what it says, summarizing the different proposals.  So that's actually a good title.  It should include links to the various proposals on the wiki.  If there's no wiki article yet, a link to a forum thread will have to do.  Now, all you have to do is get the authors of the major proposals to write their articles which, theoretically, include consolidation of the forum discussions.  ;) -- [[User:Admin|Admin]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 29 January 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Um, what project name would it be? Perhaps "Beginnings - Debate"? I made it as a sort of hub page for all the Beginnings: Projects, so it's basically a summary of all arguments I could find and the potential problems that need to be solved. There should also be a KI hub and an Instancing hub, but I don't feel knowledgeable in those areas to make them.		Um, what project name would it be? Perhaps "Beginnings - Debate"? I made it as a sort of hub page for all the Beginnings: Projects, so it's basically a summary of all arguments I could find and the potential problems that need to be solved. There should also be a KI hub and an Instancing hub, but I don't feel knowledgeable in those areas to make them.
		+
		+	I see what you're doing. I was thinking the word 'debate' should not be included in the title of an article about any one proposal. But this looks like a page doing what it says, summarizing the different proposals. So that's actually a good title. It should include links to the various proposals on the wiki. If there's no wiki article yet, a link to a forum thread will have to do. Now, all you have to do is get the authors of the major proposals to write their articles which, theoretically, include consolidation of the forum discussions. ;)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 29 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Please consider giving this more scope and making it something like "Beginnings:<project name>" or "Origin Points:<project name>". Look at Marten's work on instancing as an example.		Please consider giving this more scope and making it something like "Beginnings:<project name>" or "Origin Points:<project name>". Look at Marten's work on instancing as an example.
		+
		+	Um, what project name would it be? Perhaps "Beginnings - Debate"? I made it as a sort of hub page for all the Beginnings: Projects, so it's basically a summary of all arguments I could find and the potential problems that need to be solved. There should also be a KI hub and an Instancing hub, but I don't feel knowledgeable in those areas to make them.