In Memoriam: Tai'lahr
OpenUru.org, along with the rest of the Mystonline community, is mourning the loss of Tai'lahr on October 16th, 2019.
Rest in Peace, friend.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Age Projects - David's Journey"
(→Links: new section) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Please consider giving this more scope to consider OpenURU.org as a whole and making it something like "Projects:<project name>" or "Expansion Projects:<project name>". Look at Marten's work on instancing as an example. | + | Please consider giving this more scope to consider OpenURU.org as a whole and making it something like "Projects:<project name>" or "Expansion Projects:<project name>". Look at Marten's work on instancing as an example. -- [[User:Admin|Admin]] |
Okay, I'll try. "Move" takes it to another page, right? Perhaps the term "Age Projects:", so that things like KI reforms or such can still have the generic "Projects:" name. As for scope, any suggestions on how to make it more broad? --[[User:Gehn, lord of ages|Gehn, lord of ages]] 16:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | Okay, I'll try. "Move" takes it to another page, right? Perhaps the term "Age Projects:", so that things like KI reforms or such can still have the generic "Projects:" name. As for scope, any suggestions on how to make it more broad? --[[User:Gehn, lord of ages|Gehn, lord of ages]] 16:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == NDA == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The NDA section seems to dominate the page, which possibly detracts from the intent and purpose of the page as a whole. Also, the text seems to be largely copied from the header of the NDA form itself, so it doesn't sit well in the context of the page. Suggest reducing this to a single paragraph outline of the NDA and linking to a new David's Journey NDA page, where you can provide the expanded description of the scope of the NDA, link to your form, and maybe add other details: Things that come to mind are - | ||
| + | * How will people know who has signed your NDA? That need not be public information, but your other signatories need to know. | ||
| + | * Is there a private forum or webspace accessible only to signatories? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Mac Fife|Mac Fife]] 06:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Does [[Joining the David's Journey Team|this]] look good? I had contemplated separating the nda before, but didn't know if that would be okay (and hadn't thought of all the other stuff to put with it). Thanks. --[[User:Gehn, lord of ages|Gehn, lord of ages]] 17:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Cool. I was just worried that having a (relatively) big section on the NDA on the main page might put some folks off. --[[User:Mac Fife|Mac Fife]] 18:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Links == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I tidied up some off-wiki links today, and noticed that the last link at the bottom of the page (Questions and Answers) simply points to the root of the English Wikipedia - Is this what you really intended? -- [[User:Mac Fife|Mac Fife]] 12:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:00, 7 July 2009
Please consider giving this more scope to consider OpenURU.org as a whole and making it something like "Projects:<project name>" or "Expansion Projects:<project name>". Look at Marten's work on instancing as an example. -- Admin
Okay, I'll try. "Move" takes it to another page, right? Perhaps the term "Age Projects:", so that things like KI reforms or such can still have the generic "Projects:" name. As for scope, any suggestions on how to make it more broad? --Gehn, lord of ages 16:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
NDA
The NDA section seems to dominate the page, which possibly detracts from the intent and purpose of the page as a whole. Also, the text seems to be largely copied from the header of the NDA form itself, so it doesn't sit well in the context of the page. Suggest reducing this to a single paragraph outline of the NDA and linking to a new David's Journey NDA page, where you can provide the expanded description of the scope of the NDA, link to your form, and maybe add other details: Things that come to mind are -
- How will people know who has signed your NDA? That need not be public information, but your other signatories need to know.
- Is there a private forum or webspace accessible only to signatories?
Mac Fife 06:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Does this look good? I had contemplated separating the nda before, but didn't know if that would be okay (and hadn't thought of all the other stuff to put with it). Thanks. --Gehn, lord of ages 17:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Cool. I was just worried that having a (relatively) big section on the NDA on the main page might put some folks off. --Mac Fife 18:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Links
I tidied up some off-wiki links today, and noticed that the last link at the bottom of the page (Questions and Answers) simply points to the root of the English Wikipedia - Is this what you really intended? -- Mac Fife 12:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)